SEARCH ABOUT CEBPOUR RESEARCHGUIDELINESTOOLSLINKSAGENDA
 
Mission
Organisation
Visit us
Research themes
Projects
Staff
Publications 2010
Publications 2011
Dutch annual guidelines meeting 2010
Dutch Multidisciplinary Guidelines (including physiotherapy)
Dutch Physiotherapy Guidelines
Guideline Development
International Guidelines
Patient Information (in Dutch)
Clinical measurement instruments
Clinical Measurement Instruments Disclaimer
Databases
EBM learning materials
Full text journals
Full text PEDro papers
Guideline quality assessment tools
Materials for reviewers
Geriatrie
Field liaisons
About us
National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research
CEBP Partners
Dutch measurement instruments
European Physiotherapy Associations
Cochrane Homepage
Cochrane Library
Global Physiotherapy Associations
Cochrane Physiotherapy Reviews
Guidelines International Network
Physiotherapy exercises
Dutch Cochrane Entities
Muskuloskeletal research CAPHRI
Courses
Conferences
 
Materials for reviewers

Assessment of Cohort Studies (in Dutch)

Assessment of Diagnostic Studies (in Dutch)

Assessment of Patient Control Studies (in Dutch)

Assessment of RCTs (in Dutch)

 

 

Checklist for Systematic Reviews on Observational Studies (in Dutch)

Checklist for Systematic Reviews on RCTs (in Dutch)

 

Checklist to Evaluate A Report of a NonPharmacological Trial (in English)

 

Cochrane handbook for reviewers

Cochrane handbook for reviewers updated chapter 8

Glossary

Cochrane learning materials for reviewers

 

Reporting of Meta-analysis of Observational Studies (MOOSE)

Reporting of Meta-analyses of randomised Controlled Trials (QUORUM)

 

Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations - GRADE Working Group
Clinical guidelines are only as good as the evidence and judgments they are based on. The GRADE approach aims to make it easier for users to assess the judgments behind recommendations